Responsibilities

Responsibilities of Authors

Authors bear significant responsibilities in the journal publication process. They are primarily accountable for the accuracy and originality of the research presented. This includes ensuring that data is collected and analysed ethically, and that all findings are reported truthfully and transparently. Authors must also adhere to the journal's specific guidelines regarding formatting, citation style, and manuscript length, contributing to the overall quality and consistency of the published content.

Another key responsibility of authors is to provide a clear, accurate, and comprehensive account of their research. This includes detailing the methodology, data, and results in a manner that is transparent and reproducible. The findings should be presented objectively without manipulation or omission of significant results.

Any limitations or potential errors in the research must be disclosed to ensure the work contributes meaningfully to the academic community. Authors should also follow the specific formatting, submission, and editorial policies of the journal they are submitting to.

Beyond the technical aspects, authors have a responsibility to communicate their findings effectively to a diverse audience. This involves writing clearly and concisely, avoiding jargon, and using appropriate language that is accessible to both experts and non-specialists. Additionally, authors may be called upon to present their work at conferences or workshops, further disseminating knowledge and engaging in scholarly discourse.

Finally, if significant errors or inaccuracies are discovered in their work post-publication, authors must promptly notify the journal and work with editors to correct or retract the paper as necessary. This commitment to honesty and accountability ensures the credibility of scientific literature and supports the advancement of knowledge within the research community. By adhering to these responsibilities, authors contribute to maintaining the high ethical standards and integrity of scholarly publishing.

Responsibilities of Editors

Editors play a critical role in maintaining the integrity, quality, and credibility of scholarly journals. One of their foremost responsibilities is to oversee the entire editorial process, from manuscript submission to publication, ensuring that it is conducted fairly, transparently, and efficiently.

Editors must evaluate submissions solely based on their academic merit, originality, and relevance to the journal's scope, without discrimination based on authors' gender, race, religion, or affiliation.

They are tasked with upholding strict confidentiality regarding submitted manuscripts and must not disclose any details to unauthorized parties during the review process.

Another key responsibility of editors is to manage the peer-review process to ensure impartial and high-quality evaluations. They must select qualified and unbiased reviewers who can provide constructive feedback. Editors are responsible for making informed decisions based on reviewer comments, adhering to the journal’s policies, and communicating these decisions clearly to the authors.

In cases of ethical concerns, such as suspected plagiarism or conflicts of interest, editors must investigate thoroughly and take appropriate actions, including retractions or corrections, if necessary.

Editors also serve as guardians of ethical standards in publishing. They must establish and enforce clear policies regarding authorship, conflicts of interest, and data integrity. By fostering transparency, promoting diversity, and addressing ethical breaches promptly, editors contribute to the trustworthiness of the academic record and the advancement of knowledge in their field. Their leadership ensures the journal serves as a reliable platform for scholarly communication.

Responsibility of Reviewers

Reviewers play a crucial role in the scholarly publishing process by ensuring the quality, accuracy, and relevance of research before it is published. One of their primary responsibilities is to evaluate the manuscript objectively, assessing the scientific rigor, methodology, results, and conclusions. Reviewers should focus on the validity of the research, its contribution to the field, and its clarity, rather than on personal biases or preferences.

Reviewers are also tasked with maintaining confidentiality throughout the review process. They must not share or discuss the manuscript with anyone outside the peer review process and must not use any information from the manuscript for personal advantage. Additionally, reviewers should declare any potential conflicts of interest that could affect their impartiality in evaluating the manuscript. If they feel unable to provide an unbiased review, they should recuse themselves from the process.

Lastly, reviewers are responsible for providing timely and thorough reviews, adhering to deadlines set by the journal. Delayed or incomplete reviews can hinder the publication process and affect the journal's efficiency. They should also ensure that their feedback is respectful and constructive, offering suggestions for improving the manuscript while maintaining professionalism. By fulfilling these responsibilities, reviewers help maintain the integrity of the academic publishing process and contribute to the advancement of knowledge.